
Maps in video games are more than just the setting—they’re integral to the player’s experience. For Rockstar Games, creators of the legendary Grand Theft Auto series, crafting immersive and memorable maps has been a hallmark of their success. One map, in particular, stands out as iconic: Los Santos, the sprawling urban and rural playground of GTA V.
Despite its acclaim, Los Santos also showcases the challenges of map design. With GTA VI on the horizon, fans are speculating: does the next installment need a huge map, or is there more to be gained from a focused, dense design?
Even if you’re not a gamer, you might recognize Los Santos. Modeled after Los Angeles, the city’s intricately designed neighborhoods, landmarks, and details evoke a sense of nostalgia for players. Whether you’re racing down the freeway, cruising through Vinewood Hills, or causing mayhem in the bustling city center, Los Santos offers endless memories.
However, Los Santos isn’t without its flaws. While the urban areas brim with life and activities, the countryside—encompassing Blaine County and Mount Chiliad—feels underutilized.
Los Santos is essentially divided into two distinct zones:
This split creates a stark contrast. Most players spend their time in the city, where missions, NPCs, and activities are concentrated. The northern countryside, while expansive and visually stunning, often feels empty and purposeless, except for a handful of missions that require a trip there.
Key issues with the countryside:
This imbalance between regions has left some players feeling that GTA V’s map prioritized size over substance.
Rockstar’s history of map design provides valuable lessons:
In contrast to GTA V, these maps were designed to maximize player engagement across all regions. Every corner of the map felt worth visiting, whether for missions, secrets, or just the joy of exploration.

With the GTA VI trailer and the infamous 2022 leaks, fans have pieced together a preliminary concept of the game’s map. Set in a fictional version of Miami, Florida (dubbed Leonida by Rockstar), the map’s design seems to address several concerns raised by GTA V’s map.
Key observations from leaks and trailer analysis:
Many fans hoped for an enormous map encompassing all previous GTA cities or even the entire United States. While exciting in theory, such ambitions could compromise the quality of the game. Rockstar appears to have opted for a more focused approach, prioritizing depth over breadth.
Why a smaller, denser map might work better:
Based on community discussions, players have a clear wishlist for GTA VI:

A smaller, more densely packed map can also improve gameplay in unexpected ways:
A former Rockstar developer even suggested this approach in an interview, saying: “A smaller, but more densely packed location could bring back some of that memorable navigation that I loved from the original GTA games.”
Ultimately, the size of the map isn’t the most important factor. What matters is how the map feels during gameplay. Rockstar’s challenge with GTA VI will be to create a world that is:
If Rockstar succeeds, GTA VI could set a new benchmark for open-world games, proving that bigger isn’t always better. Los Santos taught us that maps don’t need to be massive—they need to be meaningful.
What do you think? Does GTA VI need a huge map, or is quality more important than quantity? Share your thoughts below!